Home Contact Us Stadia Pix Articles All About You Riders to Remember
DVDs Books Pictures Archive Dream Teams Programme Generator
28/02/2021
2020 Review - Part 4
Still Flying High
Your Feedback
 
21/02/2021
2020 Review - Part 3
Harold MacNaughton
Your Feedback
 
14/02/2021
Olle Nygren
2020 Review - Part 2
Your Feedback
 
07/02/2021
2020 Review - Part 1
Your Feedback
 
31/01/2021
Debut: Joe Screen
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
24/01/2021
Review: Blood & Cinders
Your Feedback
 
17/01/2021
Tai Deserves a Gong
The J.A.P is Modern Art
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
03/01/2021
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
27/12/2020
The Polish Problem
Mauger, Nielsen. World Finals.
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
16/12/2020
Simon Wigg Racing Plus!
 
10/12/2020
Review: Saving Speedway
 
06/12/2020
Great Races of the 70s/80s
The BLRC 1984
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
22/11/2020
Book Review: Dave Jessup
The BLRC 1983
Leif "Basse" Hveem
Your Feedback
 
15/11/2020
When Did it Start to Decline?
The BLRC 1982
Tracking Down the Swagman
Your Feedback
 
08/11/2020
Review: Before Air Fences
THE BLRC 1981
Dagenham
Your Feedback
 
01/11/2020
Review: Who Gates Wins
The BLRC 1980
Owlerton in the Sixties
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
25/10/2020
Doyle's Triple Crown
The BLRC 1979
Your Feedback
 
11/10/2020
New Cross Album 1936
The BLRC 1978
Your Feedback
 
04/10/2020
Sheffield 60s & 70s
The BLRC 1977
John Pilblad
Your Feedback
 


Paul Emmick's Point of View
8th February 2007

MaugerNielsen

I can't help thinking the BSPA have got things wrong with the new Super7even series. A key part of the plan sees the various shared events (ELRC, Premier Fours etc) moving to neutral venues in order to provide a level playing field. I'm not convinced that's the way forward. These events need to attract decent attendances or they become seriously devalued, the best way to ensure a healthy crowd is to attract those that live closest to the track. This means the meeting has to be attractive to the regular fans at the circuit, what better way than giving them home advantage and therefore a better than average chance of winning a national trophy?

How many Peterborough fans, used to the far-superior Elite League product, will turn out to watch the Premier League Fours final? Compare that to the attitude of the fans at Stoke, they'd turn out in great numbers because they'd fancy their team's chances of winning the competition. It will be interesting to see whether we return to the status quo in 2008.


Marketing speedway as a whole must be a fairly difficult endeavour, simply because the product varies so wildly from venue to venue. Some tracks offer a real quality evening's entertainment that can genuinely match anything else available in the local region. Sadly some others simply don't measure up. Many tracks I've visited offer little in the way of facilities for spectators and/or have a badly prepared track. Surely it's not too much to expect that a speedway can provide some kind of covered seating, edible food and a number of decent races? In my experience it does seem to be too much to expect and I now simply refuse to visit some circuits.

If I, as a committed speedway fan, feel this way then how do newcomers feel and what impression does it create of the sport as a whole? Does a badly run show at track A affect the business of track B through association and word of mouth? I suspect so and it's time something was done about it. We need to adopt a 'survival of the fittest' approach if the sport is ever to progress. Strict new criteria should be applied to all speedways and any that fail to match up should have their licence revoked. I can immediately think of five or six candidates for closure. If that eased the rider shortage at the remaining venues then all the better.


Speedway's perennial "who was the greatest?" debate has always amused me. For the last year or two it's centred around only two men - Mauger or Rickardsson? Quite wrong in my opinion, they've certainly won the most World Championships but that doesn't necessarily mean they were the best riders of all time. I'd undoubtedly place Mauger above Rickardsson simply because he won his titles under a system that offered far less margin for error. Mauger dominated the sport for a long spell but he'd only be third in my all-time list and Rickardsson would be eighth.

No, for me Hans Nielsen was the greatest speedway rider of all time. He rode consistently well over many seasons and rarely, if ever, was less than brilliant. He didn't win a world title until 1986, partly due to the brilliance of Erik Gundersen and Bruce Penhall, but I feel mainly because it took him until then to realise just how good he was and to adjust his mental approach accordingly. His consistency was unequalled and he would have won many more World Titles under a Grand Prix system, as demonstrated by his win in 1995 when he was a few summers past his best. I don't think it's too outlandish to suggest he'd have won eight or nine titles had the new system been introduced earlier.

So, if Hans was the best, who was second best? No question, it was Barry Briggs. 'Briggo' was an amazing rider whose longevity at top probably surpassed anybody else's in the post-war era. He won his fair share of titles and did it all with a style and panache that few could match. When Barry was at his best he was untouchable and in my view a better rider than Mauger. In case you're wondering, the others I'd place above Rickardsson are Fundin, Moore, Penhall and Craven.

 

This article was first published on 8th February 2007


 

  • Keith Burrows:

    "Paul Emmick certainly has a different opinion to me, and to many others I feel. Greatest ever rider Hans Neilsen????, he was a one trick pony, and that trick was getting out of the gate. Could anyone name any great Neilsen passes that didn't involve the rider being passed coming to grief?

    Whilst I would agree that some stadia leave a lot to be desired, I am sure that the supporters at that track would rather have a track than not have one whatever the facilities. Personal circumstance tell me that. The rider shortage can be solved by the usual points limit method if the promoters wanted to solve it.

    The new super7eries is a great initiative but people seem keen to rubbish it 3 months prior to a wheel being turned, we all know that these events can be financially disasterous without a base attendance and the creation of the series tries to address that. The example of the Premier League Fours at Peterboro is not really valid as The Showground has been that events traditional home for many years, and unless I'm mistaken was (and will be) well attended by travelling fans. This development deserves praise not criticism at this stage. No wonder promoters dont try many new things if this is the sort of response they get! "

    [ Use Mobile Version ]
     

     

    Comment on this Article | Contact Us | Go Back to Main Menu

  •    Please leave your comments on this article or on the site as a whole